<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (12) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183240</link>
    <description>Service rules may authorise interim suspension of a public servant pending departmental inquiry, and during that period the employee remains in service but is kept from duty. Under the Bombay Civil Service Rules, Rule 151 applies to all forms of suspension, including suspension pending inquiry or criminal proceedings, so only the prescribed subsistence allowance is payable and full salary is not due. A suspension order stated to continue pending further orders does not lapse automatically on acquittal in related criminal proceedings; termination requires a fresh order by the competent authority. The acquittal therefore does not by itself restore the employee or end the suspension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:00:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (12) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183240</link>
      <description>Service rules may authorise interim suspension of a public servant pending departmental inquiry, and during that period the employee remains in service but is kept from duty. Under the Bombay Civil Service Rules, Rule 151 applies to all forms of suspension, including suspension pending inquiry or criminal proceedings, so only the prescribed subsistence allowance is payable and full salary is not due. A suspension order stated to continue pending further orders does not lapse automatically on acquittal in related criminal proceedings; termination requires a fresh order by the competent authority. The acquittal therefore does not by itself restore the employee or end the suspension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>