https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328366 Refund of amounts already deposited could not be withheld merely because Revenue filed an appeal; the circular relied on required a stay order for withholding refund or rebate. Where the challenged orders had already dropped the service tax demands, the subsequent stay applications to refund served no surviving purpose and were therefore misconceived and infructuous. The stay applications were dismissed. en-us Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328366 Refund of amounts already deposited could not be withheld merely because Revenue filed an appeal; the circular relied on required a stay order for withholding refund or rebate. Where the challenged orders had already dropped the service tax demands, the subsequent stay applications to refund served no surviving purpose and were therefore misconceived and infructuous. The stay applications were dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328366