<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 117 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the genuineness of the share capital contribution, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s attempt to invoke Section 68 to question M/s Mahal Chand Moti Lal Kothari&#039;s credibility. The decision emphasized the importance of establishing creditworthiness to determine tax liability under the Income Tax Act, citing the parties&#039; financial evidence and previous court precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 117 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the genuineness of the share capital contribution, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s attempt to invoke Section 68 to question M/s Mahal Chand Moti Lal Kothari&#039;s credibility. The decision emphasized the importance of establishing creditworthiness to determine tax liability under the Income Tax Act, citing the parties&#039; financial evidence and previous court precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>