https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183236 A prejudicial administrative order denying crossing of the efficiency bar under Fundamental Rule 25 cannot stand where it is made after inordinate delay, following prolonged unjustified suspension, and without objective consideration or fair hearing; the refusal was therefore quashed. The document also states that delayed pensionary dues justify compensation by way of interest, and settled practice supported an award of interest at 12% per annum on the withheld monetary benefits. The stated ratio is that an order affecting civil consequences remains subject to judicial review when passed without fairness, relevant factual assessment, or due process. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:31:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183236 A prejudicial administrative order denying crossing of the efficiency bar under Fundamental Rule 25 cannot stand where it is made after inordinate delay, following prolonged unjustified suspension, and without objective consideration or fair hearing; the refusal was therefore quashed. The document also states that delayed pensionary dues justify compensation by way of interest, and settled practice supported an award of interest at 12% per annum on the withheld monetary benefits. The stated ratio is that an order affecting civil consequences remains subject to judicial review when passed without fairness, relevant factual assessment, or due process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183236