<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 843 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183234</link>
    <description>Continuation of suspension must rest on a fresh, reasoned review that addresses all material subsequent developments and the employee&#039;s representations. Mechanical repetition of earlier facts and incomplete consideration of relevant factors was held insufficient, so the orders continuing suspension were quashed. Suspension also could not be kept alive indefinitely where investigation was complete, challans had been filed, departmental proceedings had been quashed, and the criminal trials were stayed; in those circumstances, the stated risk to the inquiry or evidence no longer provided a live and substantial justification. The continued suspension was therefore held unsustainable and reinstatement with admissible consequential benefits was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 843 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183234</link>
      <description>Continuation of suspension must rest on a fresh, reasoned review that addresses all material subsequent developments and the employee&#039;s representations. Mechanical repetition of earlier facts and incomplete consideration of relevant factors was held insufficient, so the orders continuing suspension were quashed. Suspension also could not be kept alive indefinitely where investigation was complete, challans had been filed, departmental proceedings had been quashed, and the criminal trials were stayed; in those circumstances, the stated risk to the inquiry or evidence no longer provided a live and substantial justification. The continued suspension was therefore held unsustainable and reinstatement with admissible consequential benefits was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>