https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183231 The adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 73,15,931 against the appellants, despite the CESTAT remanding the case for de novo adjudication, noting that services to Military Engineering Service were not taxable under service tax. The authority classified the services under Erection, Commissioning, or Installation Service, denying the cum-service tax benefit. The appellants were granted a pre-deposit amount of Rs. 33 lakhs for the stay application, with the remaining tax, interest, and penalties stayed pending appeal, subject to compliance within a specified timeframe. The exclusion of goods supplied for service tax calculation was accepted, while the issue of service rendered in J&K was deferred for further consideration. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2016 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183231 The adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 73,15,931 against the appellants, despite the CESTAT remanding the case for de novo adjudication, noting that services to Military Engineering Service were not taxable under service tax. The authority classified the services under Erection, Commissioning, or Installation Service, denying the cum-service tax benefit. The appellants were granted a pre-deposit amount of Rs. 33 lakhs for the stay application, with the remaining tax, interest, and penalties stayed pending appeal, subject to compliance within a specified timeframe. The exclusion of goods supplied for service tax calculation was accepted, while the issue of service rendered in J&K was deferred for further consideration. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183231