<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Evidence Sufficient to Establish Liability in Intentional Duty Evasion; Precision Not Required by Revenue Authorities.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29559</link>
    <description>The case is established against the appellants at least on the yardstick of preponderance probability. Revenue is not required to prove its case with mathematical precision specially in cases involving deliberate and well-thought out modus operandi to evade duty. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:09:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:09:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Evidence Sufficient to Establish Liability in Intentional Duty Evasion; Precision Not Required by Revenue Authorities.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29559</link>
      <description>The case is established against the appellants at least on the yardstick of preponderance probability. Revenue is not required to prove its case with mathematical precision specially in cases involving deliberate and well-thought out modus operandi to evade duty. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:09:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>