https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328363 A departmental demand founded on an earlier circular could not survive once that circular had been withdrawn. The Rajasthan High Court noted that the demand originated from the November 2001 circular, but the department later withdrew it through Circular No. 870/08/2008-CX dated 16.05.2008. Because the source of the demand had ceased to operate, the adjudication order based on the withdrawn circular was unsustainable and liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328363 A departmental demand founded on an earlier circular could not survive once that circular had been withdrawn. The Rajasthan High Court noted that the demand originated from the November 2001 circular, but the department later withdrew it through Circular No. 870/08/2008-CX dated 16.05.2008. Because the source of the demand had ceased to operate, the adjudication order based on the withdrawn circular was unsustainable and liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328363