https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183226 A suspension review was held unsustainable where the competent authority failed to comply with earlier directions to consider all relevant facts and record a reasoned, speaking order. Reciting the history of litigation and CBI comments without addressing the material circumstances did not amount to an informed decision. The court reiterated that prolonged suspension alone does not automatically justify interference, but the reviewing authority must still apply its mind to the relevant record and give reasons. On that standard, the continued suspension order was quashed and the respondent's reinstatement with consequential benefits remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jun 2016 11:56:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183226 A suspension review was held unsustainable where the competent authority failed to comply with earlier directions to consider all relevant facts and record a reasoned, speaking order. Reciting the history of litigation and CBI comments without addressing the material circumstances did not amount to an informed decision. The court reiterated that prolonged suspension alone does not automatically justify interference, but the reviewing authority must still apply its mind to the relevant record and give reasons. On that standard, the continued suspension order was quashed and the respondent's reinstatement with consequential benefits remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183226