<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328331</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A) decision to tax individual members separately, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Years 2004-05 to 2008-09. The judgment clarified the tax treatment of consortium arrangements like JVs, emphasizing individual member accountability and distinct roles in project execution, in line with the CBDT circular&#039;s guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328331</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A) decision to tax individual members separately, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Years 2004-05 to 2008-09. The judgment clarified the tax treatment of consortium arrangements like JVs, emphasizing individual member accountability and distinct roles in project execution, in line with the CBDT circular&#039;s guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>