<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 28 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328319</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the objection in principle and remitting the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for further examination of the segmental accounts. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 31st March 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:40:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 28 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328319</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal upholding the objection in principle and remitting the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for further examination of the segmental accounts. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 31st March 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>