<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (9) TMI 57 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183212</link>
    <description>A principal-to-principal sales arrangement, without independent material showing agency or another sufficient nexus, does not by itself create a business connection in British India under section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922; the assessee was therefore not chargeable on that basis. The Revenue also could not raise for the first time before the Tribunal a new contention that part of the income was received in British India, because the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction is confined to the subject-matter of the appeal and a wholly new case cannot be introduced at that stage. The reference was answered wholly in favour of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (9) TMI 57 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183212</link>
      <description>A principal-to-principal sales arrangement, without independent material showing agency or another sufficient nexus, does not by itself create a business connection in British India under section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922; the assessee was therefore not chargeable on that basis. The Revenue also could not raise for the first time before the Tribunal a new contention that part of the income was received in British India, because the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction is confined to the subject-matter of the appeal and a wholly new case cannot be introduced at that stage. The reference was answered wholly in favour of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>