<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 123 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3675</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the interim order did not extend the period of limitation, favoring the assessee. However, the appellate order directing de novo consideration was deemed a binding direction under Section 153(3)(ii), favoring the Revenue. The reference was answered accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 123 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3675</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the interim order did not extend the period of limitation, favoring the assessee. However, the appellate order directing de novo consideration was deemed a binding direction under Section 153(3)(ii), favoring the Revenue. The reference was answered accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>