<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 811 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the suspension of the appellant&#039;s CHA license unjustified, considering their clean record and the difficulty in verifying goods&#039; physical nature. Precedents showing 6 months&#039; suspension as sufficient punishment for CHAs were noted. As the goods matched the importer&#039;s declarations, the suspension order was set aside, allowing the appellant to resume operations with a commitment not to handle imports by individuals until the matter was resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 811 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the suspension of the appellant&#039;s CHA license unjustified, considering their clean record and the difficulty in verifying goods&#039; physical nature. Precedents showing 6 months&#039; suspension as sufficient punishment for CHAs were noted. As the goods matched the importer&#039;s declarations, the suspension order was set aside, allowing the appellant to resume operations with a commitment not to handle imports by individuals until the matter was resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>