<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 67 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3671</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that dividend income earned in Malaysia is not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The court emphasized the primacy of DTAA provisions over local tax laws, citing relevant case law. It affirmed the ITAT&#039;s jurisdiction to consider new issues and criticized the dismissal of cross-objections on limitation grounds. The Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 67 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3671</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that dividend income earned in Malaysia is not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The court emphasized the primacy of DTAA provisions over local tax laws, citing relevant case law. It affirmed the ITAT&#039;s jurisdiction to consider new issues and criticized the dismissal of cross-objections on limitation grounds. The Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>