<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1117 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183185</link>
    <description>Food additives are treated as distinct from food under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, because they are substances not normally consumed as food and are regulated through separate statutory provisions. The packaging and labelling regime under Section 23 and the 2011 regulations applies to packaged food, and is not mechanically extendable to food additives without specific regulatory cover. Imported goods with labelling defects may have the deficiency cured in India before release by the person dealing with the goods after import. For filled chocolates containing vegetable fat in the filling, the scope of the prohibition required regulatory determination, so the issue was remitted while the interim position in favour of the importer continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1117 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183185</link>
      <description>Food additives are treated as distinct from food under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, because they are substances not normally consumed as food and are regulated through separate statutory provisions. The packaging and labelling regime under Section 23 and the 2011 regulations applies to packaged food, and is not mechanically extendable to food additives without specific regulatory cover. Imported goods with labelling defects may have the deficiency cured in India before release by the person dealing with the goods after import. For filled chocolates containing vegetable fat in the filling, the scope of the prohibition required regulatory determination, so the issue was remitted while the interim position in favour of the importer continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>