https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328300 An undeclared gold bangle carried by a passenger acting as a paid carrier was treated as liable to absolute confiscation because the passenger's voluntary admission showed that she was transporting the goods for delivery to another person and not as bona fide baggage. On that basis, re-export was held impermissible under the Customs Act, 1962, and the earlier permission for re-export was set aside. The reduced penalty was not disturbed, as the contravention of the declaration requirement remained established but no further interference was justified on the facts. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328300 An undeclared gold bangle carried by a passenger acting as a paid carrier was treated as liable to absolute confiscation because the passenger's voluntary admission showed that she was transporting the goods for delivery to another person and not as bona fide baggage. On that basis, re-export was held impermissible under the Customs Act, 1962, and the earlier permission for re-export was set aside. The reduced penalty was not disturbed, as the contravention of the declaration requirement remained established but no further interference was justified on the facts. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328300