<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (1) TMI 66 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183182</link>
    <description>The SC examined the Bombay Prevention of Excommunication Act, 1949, challenging its constitutionality. The Court ruled the Act void, finding it violated Article 26 by interfering with the Dawoodi Bohra community&#039;s religious practices. The majority judgment held that the right to excommunicate members on religious grounds was an integral part of the community&#039;s religious management, and the Act unconstitutionally restricted this fundamental right.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (1) TMI 66 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183182</link>
      <description>The SC examined the Bombay Prevention of Excommunication Act, 1949, challenging its constitutionality. The Court ruled the Act void, finding it violated Article 26 by interfering with the Dawoodi Bohra community&#039;s religious practices. The majority judgment held that the right to excommunicate members on religious grounds was an integral part of the community&#039;s religious management, and the Act unconstitutionally restricted this fundamental right.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>