https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328296 The court granted the petition for restoration of the company's name in the register under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner's name was struck off due to non-compliance with filing requirements, despite claiming lack of notice and opportunity to be heard. Acknowledging the company's continuous operation and efforts to rectify the situation, the court allowed restoration upon submission of outstanding documents and payment of fees. The court emphasized the importance of compliance and granted the restoration within a specified timeframe, while permitting the respondent to pursue penal action for non-compliance with the Companies Act. en-us Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jun 2016 11:16:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328296 The court granted the petition for restoration of the company's name in the register under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner's name was struck off due to non-compliance with filing requirements, despite claiming lack of notice and opportunity to be heard. Acknowledging the company's continuous operation and efforts to rectify the situation, the court allowed restoration upon submission of outstanding documents and payment of fees. The court emphasized the importance of compliance and granted the restoration within a specified timeframe, while permitting the respondent to pursue penal action for non-compliance with the Companies Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328296