<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 979 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183181</link>
    <description>Section 102 CrPC empowers seizure of certain property by police, but it does not authorise attachment of immovable property; attachment under Sections 83 to 86 must be ordered by a court, not created from a police request. The Registration Act permits a registering officer to act on copies of orders or decrees issued by a competent authority, but it does not allow the Sub Registrar to record an attachment merely on the basis of police communication. A police request cannot itself create a valid encumbrance or burden on immovable property, so any endorsement made without a lawful attachment order is unauthorised and illegal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 11:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 979 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183181</link>
      <description>Section 102 CrPC empowers seizure of certain property by police, but it does not authorise attachment of immovable property; attachment under Sections 83 to 86 must be ordered by a court, not created from a police request. The Registration Act permits a registering officer to act on copies of orders or decrees issued by a competent authority, but it does not allow the Sub Registrar to record an attachment merely on the basis of police communication. A police request cannot itself create a valid encumbrance or burden on immovable property, so any endorsement made without a lawful attachment order is unauthorised and illegal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>