<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 170 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3668</link>
    <description>Dispute over inclusion of an alleged amount in assessable value led the tribunal to find a prima facie case on the manufacturer&#039;s argument that the amount was not collected by it and had no nexus with transaction value. The revenue had not, at the interim stage, shown that the alleged per-litre amount formed part of the cost of manufacture or the assessable value. On that limited scrutiny, pre-deposit of the confirmed duty was waived and recovery of the duty demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 170 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3668</link>
      <description>Dispute over inclusion of an alleged amount in assessable value led the tribunal to find a prima facie case on the manufacturer&#039;s argument that the amount was not collected by it and had no nexus with transaction value. The revenue had not, at the interim stage, shown that the alleged per-litre amount formed part of the cost of manufacture or the assessable value. On that limited scrutiny, pre-deposit of the confirmed duty was waived and recovery of the duty demand was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>