<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328292</link>
    <description>Bank classification of an account as NPA under the SARFAESI framework was upheld where default was established and minor discrepancies in dates were treated as immaterial. The bank&#039;s reply to the borrower&#039;s objections contained reasons for rejecting the representation, and no material showed arbitrary action or non-compliance with statutory requirements warranting writ interference. RBI guidelines were treated as executive instructions rather than enforceable constraints on the action taken in these facts. The availability of remedies within the SARFAESI mechanism also weighed against intervention, and the challenge to the NPA declaration and related notices failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 10:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328292</link>
      <description>Bank classification of an account as NPA under the SARFAESI framework was upheld where default was established and minor discrepancies in dates were treated as immaterial. The bank&#039;s reply to the borrower&#039;s objections contained reasons for rejecting the representation, and no material showed arbitrary action or non-compliance with statutory requirements warranting writ interference. RBI guidelines were treated as executive instructions rather than enforceable constraints on the action taken in these facts. The availability of remedies within the SARFAESI mechanism also weighed against intervention, and the challenge to the NPA declaration and related notices failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>