https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183165 The ITAT remitted several issues back to the AO for fresh consideration, including unexplained investments and accretion of advances. The CIT(A) deleted certain additions, which were upheld by the ITAT. The treatment of income from other sources and receipts from civil contract works was also confirmed in favor of the assessee. Ultimately, the assessee's appeals for certain assessment years were partly allowed, while the revenue's appeals for other years were dismissed. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 May 2016 12:39:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183165 The ITAT remitted several issues back to the AO for fresh consideration, including unexplained investments and accretion of advances. The CIT(A) deleted certain additions, which were upheld by the ITAT. The treatment of income from other sources and receipts from civil contract works was also confirmed in favor of the assessee. Ultimately, the assessee's appeals for certain assessment years were partly allowed, while the revenue's appeals for other years were dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183165