<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1258 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, determining that payments made by the assessee on behalf of clients were not subject to TDS under Section 194C. Therefore, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was justified. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1258 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, determining that payments made by the assessee on behalf of clients were not subject to TDS under Section 194C. Therefore, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was justified. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>