<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1257 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s appeal and cross objection, as well as the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to estimate the profit on sales at 0.5% instead of 5% and to delete the addition on account of unexplained outstanding balances of creditors. The judgment highlighted the significance of thorough verification and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s authority to conduct necessary inquiries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 11:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1257 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s appeal and cross objection, as well as the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to estimate the profit on sales at 0.5% instead of 5% and to delete the addition on account of unexplained outstanding balances of creditors. The judgment highlighted the significance of thorough verification and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s authority to conduct necessary inquiries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>