<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1203 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183161</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed a refund order-cum-demand notice and set aside four orders passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to re-hear and adjudicate on the issues within four months, with the deposited amount to be subject to the final outcome. Both writ petitions were disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 11:20:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1203 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183161</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed a refund order-cum-demand notice and set aside four orders passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to re-hear and adjudicate on the issues within four months, with the deposited amount to be subject to the final outcome. Both writ petitions were disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>