https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3659 The appellants successfully appealed the rejection of their claim for interest on delayed sanction of refund. The Vice-President, relying on a Rajasthan High Court judgment, held that interest should be paid after three months from the date of the refund application, regardless of the adjudicative decision on duty payment and refund sanction. The decision emphasized the distinction between delayed refunds due to disputes and excess duty paid, granting the appellants the right to interest on the delayed refund amount. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellants were entitled to interest on the delayed refund. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3659 The appellants successfully appealed the rejection of their claim for interest on delayed sanction of refund. The Vice-President, relying on a Rajasthan High Court judgment, held that interest should be paid after three months from the date of the refund application, regardless of the adjudicative decision on duty payment and refund sanction. The decision emphasized the distinction between delayed refunds due to disputes and excess duty paid, granting the appellants the right to interest on the delayed refund amount. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellants were entitled to interest on the delayed refund. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3659