<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Against Unjustified Transfer or Re-export Requirement for Petitioner&#039;s Vessels Used Over Three Years.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29529</link>
    <description>SFIS - there is no justification for the DoR to insist that the vessels of the Petitioner that have completed more than three years after import should be transferred only by sale within group companies or managed hotels or be re-exported. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 10:30:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 10:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Against Unjustified Transfer or Re-export Requirement for Petitioner&#039;s Vessels Used Over Three Years.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29529</link>
      <description>SFIS - there is no justification for the DoR to insist that the vessels of the Petitioner that have completed more than three years after import should be transferred only by sale within group companies or managed hotels or be re-exported. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 10:30:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>