https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183156 The earlier Supreme Court interpretation of Section 138(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 remained binding on the High Court under Article 141. Later coequal Benches could not overrule or disregard that authority merely because subsequent cases on similar municipal provisions distinguished it on the basis of differing statutory language, including the absence of a non obstante clause. The Court found no compelling grounds to revisit the earlier construction, as the threshold for reconsideration of precedent was not met. The binding force of the prior interpretation was affirmed and reconsideration was rejected. en-us Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 May 2016 18:51:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183156 The earlier Supreme Court interpretation of Section 138(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 remained binding on the High Court under Article 141. Later coequal Benches could not overrule or disregard that authority merely because subsequent cases on similar municipal provisions distinguished it on the basis of differing statutory language, including the absence of a non obstante clause. The Court found no compelling grounds to revisit the earlier construction, as the threshold for reconsideration of precedent was not met. The binding force of the prior interpretation was affirmed and reconsideration was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183156