<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (9) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183151</link>
    <description>An earlier Madhya Bharat notification allowing sales at column III rates did not survive once the Indian Iron &amp; Steel (Scrap Control) Order, 1943 was extended to Madhya Bharat, because the later control order occupied the field and the saving provision preserved prior directions only so far as they were not displaced. The General Clauses Act did not keep the notification alive after the order under which it operated ceased to apply. An unincorporated scrap dealers&#039; association was also treated as liable for sales made through its business operations, and its President could not avoid responsibility where the association benefited from controlled-source classification and the contravention was committed through its activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 18:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (9) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183151</link>
      <description>An earlier Madhya Bharat notification allowing sales at column III rates did not survive once the Indian Iron &amp; Steel (Scrap Control) Order, 1943 was extended to Madhya Bharat, because the later control order occupied the field and the saving provision preserved prior directions only so far as they were not displaced. The General Clauses Act did not keep the notification alive after the order under which it operated ceased to apply. An unincorporated scrap dealers&#039; association was also treated as liable for sales made through its business operations, and its President could not avoid responsibility where the association benefited from controlled-source classification and the contravention was committed through its activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>