<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183145</link>
    <description>A duly registered Will may be upheld when it is proved through attesting and scribing witnesses, is corroborated by the testator&#039;s own admission, and satisfies the proof and attestation requirements under the Evidence Act and Succession Act; exclusion of a natural heir or beneficiary participation, by itself, is not a suspicious circumstance. A claim of adoption that would alter the normal line of succession must be proved by clear, consistent, and convincing evidence, including essential particulars and supporting documentation. On the stated facts, the Will was accepted as genuine and the adoption claim failed for want of sufficient proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:28:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 647 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183145</link>
      <description>A duly registered Will may be upheld when it is proved through attesting and scribing witnesses, is corroborated by the testator&#039;s own admission, and satisfies the proof and attestation requirements under the Evidence Act and Succession Act; exclusion of a natural heir or beneficiary participation, by itself, is not a suspicious circumstance. A claim of adoption that would alter the normal line of succession must be proved by clear, consistent, and convincing evidence, including essential particulars and supporting documentation. On the stated facts, the Will was accepted as genuine and the adoption claim failed for want of sufficient proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>