<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 872 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183144</link>
    <description>Rule 60(a) of Part I of the Kerala Service Rules fixed retirement at 55 years, and the exception in Rule 60(b) applied only to officers in the Last Grade Service on 07.04.1970 who continued in that service as defined in Rule 12(16A). The exception was treated as special and subject to strict construction, so aided school service as a full-time menial did not establish entitlement unless it fell within the protected Last Grade Service category. The provisions on qualifying service and past aided school service under Part III were relevant to pension, not to extending service to 60 years. The employee therefore could not claim continuation up to 60 years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 872 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183144</link>
      <description>Rule 60(a) of Part I of the Kerala Service Rules fixed retirement at 55 years, and the exception in Rule 60(b) applied only to officers in the Last Grade Service on 07.04.1970 who continued in that service as defined in Rule 12(16A). The exception was treated as special and subject to strict construction, so aided school service as a full-time menial did not establish entitlement unless it fell within the protected Last Grade Service category. The provisions on qualifying service and past aided school service under Part III were relevant to pension, not to extending service to 60 years. The employee therefore could not claim continuation up to 60 years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>