<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1229 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328248</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 54,32,279, as the full amount of hire charges had been offered for taxation in two years, preventing double taxation of the same income. The ITAT emphasized the importance of accounting consistency and tax neutrality, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1229 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328248</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 54,32,279, as the full amount of hire charges had been offered for taxation in two years, preventing double taxation of the same income. The ITAT emphasized the importance of accounting consistency and tax neutrality, ultimately leading to the deletion of the addition made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>