<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1223 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer due to jurisdictional issues. The AO did not make any additions based on the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment, rendering the reassessment invalid. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, following the precedent set by the Delhi High Court, and pronounced the decision on 25th April 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:56:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1223 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer due to jurisdictional issues. The AO did not make any additions based on the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment, rendering the reassessment invalid. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, following the precedent set by the Delhi High Court, and pronounced the decision on 25th April 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>