https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183132 An order under article 226 can be a judgment appealable under clause 15 of the Letters Patent where it finally determines a right or liability in the writ proceeding itself, even if the assessment remains pending; the court held an appeal lay. Service of notice under section 34 by affixation was invalid because affixation under Order V rules 15 and 17 is permissible only after due and reasonable diligence has failed to locate the person to be served; mere absence at the address was insufficient. As valid service was not established, the further assessment step based on that notice was without jurisdiction, and restraining relief was granted. en-us Wed, 24 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 May 2016 16:37:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183132 An order under article 226 can be a judgment appealable under clause 15 of the Letters Patent where it finally determines a right or liability in the writ proceeding itself, even if the assessment remains pending; the court held an appeal lay. Service of notice under section 34 by affixation was invalid because affixation under Order V rules 15 and 17 is permissible only after due and reasonable diligence has failed to locate the person to be served; mere absence at the address was insufficient. As valid service was not established, the further assessment step based on that notice was without jurisdiction, and restraining relief was granted. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 24 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183132