<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1188 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) due to a defective show cause notice and inconclusive findings in the penalty order. The proportionate disallowance of interest on borrowed capital was deemed not deserving of a penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 16:29:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1188 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) due to a defective show cause notice and inconclusive findings in the penalty order. The proportionate disallowance of interest on borrowed capital was deemed not deserving of a penalty. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>