https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328236 The Tribunal upheld the tax liability of the appellant under the Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) category for the period in question and confirmed penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994. Despite the appellant's arguments of lack of awareness and bonafide belief, the Tribunal found no reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax and dismissed the appeal. The appellant's registration with the Service Tax Department and partial payment were acknowledged, but the lack of cooperation and incomplete financial details led to the decision against the appellant. The appeal was dismissed on 16.05.2016. en-us Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 May 2016 15:44:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328236 The Tribunal upheld the tax liability of the appellant under the Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) category for the period in question and confirmed penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994. Despite the appellant's arguments of lack of awareness and bonafide belief, the Tribunal found no reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax and dismissed the appeal. The appellant's registration with the Service Tax Department and partial payment were acknowledged, but the lack of cooperation and incomplete financial details led to the decision against the appellant. The appeal was dismissed on 16.05.2016. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328236