<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1209 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the time-barred decision based on the original claim filing date for limitation purposes. The case was remanded for further examination of unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of cooperation in document submission and the appellant&#039;s right to challenge document requests as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 15:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=430006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1209 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the time-barred decision based on the original claim filing date for limitation purposes. The case was remanded for further examination of unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of cooperation in document submission and the appellant&#039;s right to challenge document requests as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>