https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183127 The Supreme Court held that the amendment to the Recruitment Rules for Motor Vehicle Inspectors in Karnataka was prospective, not retrospective. As the Rules did not enforce the amendment retrospectively, the appellants' right to selection and appointment was upheld under the Rules existing at the time of their application. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's decision, and directed the State Government to make appointments based on the original select list prepared by the Commission. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 May 2016 15:32:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183127 The Supreme Court held that the amendment to the Recruitment Rules for Motor Vehicle Inspectors in Karnataka was prospective, not retrospective. As the Rules did not enforce the amendment retrospectively, the appellants' right to selection and appointment was upheld under the Rules existing at the time of their application. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's decision, and directed the State Government to make appointments based on the original select list prepared by the Commission. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183127