<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 684 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183110</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court admitted the civil appeal and directed that any payment made under the impugned judgment would remain subject to further orders in the appeal. The order is procedural and does not decide the substantive central excise dispute at this stage; it only preserves the Court&#039;s ability to make further directions on the payment already made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 13:48:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 684 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183110</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court admitted the civil appeal and directed that any payment made under the impugned judgment would remain subject to further orders in the appeal. The order is procedural and does not decide the substantive central excise dispute at this stage; it only preserves the Court&#039;s ability to make further directions on the payment already made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>