<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1199 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328218</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside both penalties under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules and Rule 15(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules. The penalty under Rule 25 was overturned due to timely tax payment and financial constraints. Additionally, the penalty under Rule 15(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules was annulled as Rule 8(3A) was declared unconstitutional, enabling CENVAT Credit for duty payment. Consequential relief was granted to the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1199 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328218</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside both penalties under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules and Rule 15(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules. The penalty under Rule 25 was overturned due to timely tax payment and financial constraints. Additionally, the penalty under Rule 15(1) of CENVAT Credit Rules was annulled as Rule 8(3A) was declared unconstitutional, enabling CENVAT Credit for duty payment. Consequential relief was granted to the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>