<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1197 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs and service tax on inward carriage. The appellant&#039;s activities were deemed to constitute manufacturing under Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, entitling them to the credit. The Tribunal clarified that even without traditional manufacturing, the appellant&#039;s processes qualified for the credit, including on inward GTA service. The decision provided clarity on Rule 16 interpretation, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit and setting aside the previous order, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1197 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs and service tax on inward carriage. The appellant&#039;s activities were deemed to constitute manufacturing under Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, entitling them to the credit. The Tribunal clarified that even without traditional manufacturing, the appellant&#039;s processes qualified for the credit, including on inward GTA service. The decision provided clarity on Rule 16 interpretation, affirming the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit and setting aside the previous order, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>