<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 57 -  CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for implementation of the refund claimed by the appellant, upholding the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to credit the amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund based on the assumption of duty burden passed on to the buyer. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision aligned with the law and the Tribunal&#039;s directives, advising the applicant to seek recourse through the appellate forum if dissatisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 57 -  CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for implementation of the refund claimed by the appellant, upholding the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to credit the amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund based on the assumption of duty burden passed on to the buyer. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision aligned with the law and the Tribunal&#039;s directives, advising the applicant to seek recourse through the appellate forum if dissatisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>