https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328213 The High Court partly allowed the writ petition challenging the order directing clearance of goods, emphasizing non-retrospective applicability of a circular. A preliminary objection on non-compliance with court orders was rejected, allowing appeals to proceed. The jurisdiction of the writ petition was upheld, clarifying the circular's nature. The interpretation of the circular favored allowing appeals on merit. Locus standi of an intervenor was considered, and notices were issued for further proceedings. Contempt proceedings were balanced with granting interim relief to stay the order's operation. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 May 2016 10:46:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328213 The High Court partly allowed the writ petition challenging the order directing clearance of goods, emphasizing non-retrospective applicability of a circular. A preliminary objection on non-compliance with court orders was rejected, allowing appeals to proceed. The jurisdiction of the writ petition was upheld, clarifying the circular's nature. The interpretation of the circular favored allowing appeals on merit. Locus standi of an intervenor was considered, and notices were issued for further proceedings. Contempt proceedings were balanced with granting interim relief to stay the order's operation. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328213