<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1192 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328211</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed on both jurisdictional grounds and merits. The show-cause notice issued by the ADG-DRI was found to be without jurisdiction as DRI officers were not authorized under Rule 16. The Revenue failed to substantiate fraudulent claims of duty drawback, leading to the order being set aside, and relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 10:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1192 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328211</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed on both jurisdictional grounds and merits. The show-cause notice issued by the ADG-DRI was found to be without jurisdiction as DRI officers were not authorized under Rule 16. The Revenue failed to substantiate fraudulent claims of duty drawback, leading to the order being set aside, and relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>