<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1044 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation at 80% annually for the power evacuation facility, permitting the deduction of insurance premium for partners as Keyman Insurance, and treating interest income from money lending as business income. The decisions were based on precedents set by the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and the Chandigarh Bench, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 10:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1044 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing depreciation at 80% annually for the power evacuation facility, permitting the deduction of insurance premium for partners as Keyman Insurance, and treating interest income from money lending as business income. The decisions were based on precedents set by the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court and the Chandigarh Bench, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>