<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 109 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3642</link>
    <description>Additional Excise Duty on textiles and textile articles may be discharged from the Cenvat credit account where the governing duty provisions and credit rules contain no express prohibition. The Tribunal noted only a restriction against using credit meant for basic excise duty for that purpose, and held that this did not prevent payment of the additional duty from the available credit balance. The analysis concluded in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, with the impugned order set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 109 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3642</link>
      <description>Additional Excise Duty on textiles and textile articles may be discharged from the Cenvat credit account where the governing duty provisions and credit rules contain no express prohibition. The Tribunal noted only a restriction against using credit meant for basic excise duty for that purpose, and held that this did not prevent payment of the additional duty from the available credit balance. The analysis concluded in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, with the impugned order set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>