<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1185 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328204</link>
    <description>The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to verify the expenses claimed by the assessee and set aside both appeals for reassessment. The ITAT emphasized the need for proper verification of expenses and allowed the appeals for statistical purposes only. The decision was pronounced on 22/04/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 09:16:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1185 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328204</link>
      <description>The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to verify the expenses claimed by the assessee and set aside both appeals for reassessment. The ITAT emphasized the need for proper verification of expenses and allowed the appeals for statistical purposes only. The decision was pronounced on 22/04/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>