<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328202</link>
    <description>Functional comparability, not a single year&#039;s profit or loss, governs the selection of comparables in transfer pricing analysis. The Tribunal held that a loss-making company cannot be excluded merely because it reported a loss if it is otherwise functionally similar to the tested party. It also noted that the same entity had been accepted by the Revenue in earlier and subsequent years, supporting its comparability. On that basis, ICRA Management Consulting Services Ltd. was wrongly excluded from the comparable set, and the assessee&#039;s margin would have fallen within the permissible range if it were included. The transfer pricing adjustment was therefore unsustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1183 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328202</link>
      <description>Functional comparability, not a single year&#039;s profit or loss, governs the selection of comparables in transfer pricing analysis. The Tribunal held that a loss-making company cannot be excluded merely because it reported a loss if it is otherwise functionally similar to the tested party. It also noted that the same entity had been accepted by the Revenue in earlier and subsequent years, supporting its comparability. On that basis, ICRA Management Consulting Services Ltd. was wrongly excluded from the comparable set, and the assessee&#039;s margin would have fallen within the permissible range if it were included. The transfer pricing adjustment was therefore unsustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>