<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 41 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3641</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could be used to discharge Additional Duty of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) because neither the duty provisions nor the Cenvat Credit Rules imposed a prohibition on such payment. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s contention on permissible utilisation of the Cenvat account and rejected the denial of that mode of payment. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 41 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3641</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could be used to discharge Additional Duty of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) because neither the duty provisions nor the Cenvat Credit Rules imposed a prohibition on such payment. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s contention on permissible utilisation of the Cenvat account and rejected the denial of that mode of payment. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>